I was cruising through my daily dose of FierceCable the other day when I happened upon this piece about a Las Vegas company that’s launching what it calls the “first ever worldwide broadband cable television network.”

Actually, there was a little language disconnect on the whole thing. The company was not creating a new cable network; it was creating a method by which its subscribers would have access to every cable network in every language available in the world.

Now that, I thought, is an ambitious goal. How exactly are they going to do that?

Seems that the company is doing something that smacks of the familiar. To gather all this programming and deliver it to all these subscribers worldwide the company is using what it calls CloudDVR, which it said in a news release that accompanied the FierceCable piece would “provide online storage for up to 180 days for every channel on the service, making a multi-million-hour home DVR available to members with active subscriptions to the content.”

I thought I’d heard that idea before and it only took me a second to figure out where: it’s what I’ve been talking about, railing about, cajoling about since I started writing this thing. Content in the cloud that can be pulled down and used by cable subscribers.

The difference is, while these folks are talking about putting some kind of 180-day storage limit on their content, the stuff I’ve been talking about would be virtually limitless because it would be stored and ready for the picking whenever a subscriber wants.

That Internet cloud really has no limits because content can be prepared, stored, retrieved and distributed from it in almost infinite ways. In the case of interactivity, the content can be delivered when subscribers want to do something other than sit back and watch television or it can be delivered when subscribers want to sit back and watch television… and do something else. It doesn’t have to be downloaded and stored on premise; it doesn’t have to be erased to make room for new content; and it doesn’t have to be watched by the consumer. It’s just there.

So, while I applaud these newcomers for their enthusiasm and I wish them well in their quest to get vendors to build equipment and programmers to provide the content to make their dream come true, I have to remind them their idea is not new. Over here at ActiveVideo, we’ve been talking about it for years.

So Steve Jobs has come down from the mountain and presented the world with the Apple tablet and the world literally is a-twitter. The iPad, it’s said, is going to change the world the way iPods changed mobile entertainment, iPhones changed mobile phones and iTunes changed music.

Anyway, the earliest glowing reports state that the iPad is the most amazing tablet since Moses carried a pair down from a mountain with a few societal rules. The thing I thought was most interesting — not compelling, you understand, interesting — was early talk that the iPad would save newspapers.

Apparently people who don’t like to pick up that bulky old collection of newsprint won’t mind sitting on the morning train with an iPad warming their lap and breezing through the sports section. Apparently.

When you think about it, newspapers, so obviously a low-tech information conveyance, are logically a top application for high-tech gear. Newspapers, after all, were the original interactive devices. A reporter would write a story; a reader would call the editor and demand the reporter be fired; an editor, depending on the kind of day he was having and whether his liquor supply was in order, would comply with the demand or, more likely, tell the caller to write a letter to the editor. The letter would appear in a later edition. It doesn’t get more interactive than that.

Newspapers, though, have been supplanted by television because people apparently don’t want to make the effort to sit down and read through all the pages. I’m not sure that any kind of handheld device, even one as marvelous as the iPad, will solve that. People are just more willing to have their news read to them.

Newspapers have dabbled in video on the web, but the best way for them to fight television is to create a video experience of their own. Make the Daily Bugle interactive with its own listing or video-rich iPad app. Push a button, and learn who’s died, who’s been born, who’s getting married and which one of your neighbors is in jail because those tomatoes he was growing weren’t really tomatoes. That’s the kind of information that will never make the evening TV news.

Today’s newspapers have all the tools to be truly interactive with any connected device. Their staffs shoot video as often as still photos; stories are continually updated throughout the day; they all have Web sites; and some of the more advanced ones will actually read the stories to you so you feel like you’re watching the evening news — only with more depth and accuracy.

I’m thinking that maybe newspapers aren’t as dead as we’ve been led to believe. While the iPad focus has been on reviving “print,” I’m thinking that a rich, interactive video experience can bring new life to the medium.

Television news started with anchors unapologetically reading their on-air stories from the newspaper. Interactivity can revive that trend in a positive way for newspapers. Get the headlines from the traditional TV news sources, but when you want the real story only community journalism can provide, tap into the Bugle News site on television — or your iPad.

Perhaps it’s just my post-holiday pre-CES mood, but something has me thinking that somewhere along the line we’ve lost the true message of TV Everywhere.

It’s not as strange as it seems — or maybe it is, who am I to judge? — but the combination of a holiday filled with home electronics and big screen TVs and an upcoming trade show that is founded on the concept of highlighting what’s coming next in the wide world of consumer electronics lead me down the path that TV is the center of the universe.

At least when it comes to home electronics.

Yeah, there are computers, computer games, computer games on TV, PDAs and what used to be PDAs now called MP3 players, or, to breach the dreaded brand name space, iPods and iPhones. And there are DVRs and TiVos (again, breaching into the brand name space) and video-on-demand and pay-per-view. There are smartphones and hardly any dumb phones other than the ones that are still tethered to your walls. And there are home entertainment centers into which any and all of the aforementioned devices and applications can be plugged but which ultimately have one centerpiece: that’s right, the television.

So while the idea of taking television and putting it on any of those new devices is fun and something you definitely want to do when you leave the home entertainment cocoon, the reality is that when you’re in that cocoon you want TV that provides you with the same functionality as those outside devices. Why only have the latest TV applications on devices that aren’t TVs? Why only have access to Web video on your cell phone or computer when the best screen in your house is your TV?

The reason this freight train of thought is driving through my mind these days is that a collision, of sorts, is on the horizon. The CE manufacturers and cable TV service providers, seemingly forever at odds, are moving closer to each other in a friendly manner. TVs are becoming acclimated to cable and cable is becoming less hostile to TV. TV has the screen and the capabilities to deliver a variety of what cable does best: programming. Cable has that programming and the delivery method to get it to the TV.

What once seemed like an inevitable derailment caused by the collision between two forces moving purposefully and speedily on the same tracks in different directions now looks to be an opportunity to couple two powerful trains and move in the same direction. Again, it’s the holidays so toy trains are on my mind.

The coupler that puts this all together is ActiveVideo. We bring the Internet content — and the myriad media types that exist there — from the Internet via the network cloud to any set-top box allowing subscribers to have TV Everywhere on the screen where it matters the most: the TV.

But it’s not just about bringing Web video to the TV. Just as important as a piece of media is the ability to infuse TV with the same constantly evolving innovation that happens on the Web. ActiveVideo not only brings you online media, but by supporting Web functionality it brings the infinite possibilities of connecting and integrating that media into your digital lifestyle.

As I say, TV Everywhere, while seemingly a concept that drags consumers off the television and into the realm of other Web-enabled devices, is actually the magnet that can draw them back to the place where they are most comfortable; the home entertainment center. Sure, take as much content as you can and spread it to as many devices as you like, but don’t forget the centerpiece. It is, after all is said and done, TV Everywhere; let’s keep the TV at the forefront of the experience.