CloudTV™ Blog
Blog Home
 
Subscribe
 Subscribe to RSS feed
Get updates via Email (enter your email address below):
 
 
User Admin

You are currently browsing the ActiveVideo blog archives for May, 2010.

Categories
Advertising (12)
Content (60)
Distribution (43)
Ecosystem (46)
Events (6)
Uncategorized (28)
Archive for May 2010

Google: If Anyone Can Pull off a New TV Model, They Can
Thursday, May 27th, 2010 by Edgar Villalpando – SVP Marketing

GoogleTV

At first glance, this whole idea of Google TV seems like a ho-hum, here comes somebody else to try to make waves in the cable industry. Stand there in line behind Microsoft and TiVo and Apple and all the others who have come before you with limited or no success.

Sure, the surface concept seems shallow and devoid of content and distribution. Sure, the idea of showing today’s Web content on the Internet has been tried before and the audience has never been there. And sure, there is already a moneymaking machine in charge of television, from the broadcasters to the cable channels to the pay TV channels and it’s tough for anybody to throw a stick into the spokes of that well-oiled organization. And sure, it’s a solution that requires yet another box when content can instead be streamed directly from the cloud.

Beneath the surface, though, are a few lingering thoughts: This is Google, this is the age of partnerships, and the very mention of Google TV seems to have been enough to wake Apple TV from its slumber. So maybe there’s something there after all.

Content? Yeah what’s out there now is weak but when you have a pipe the size of Google’s and a potential audience used to tapping the search engine for anything from a word definition to a map to a satellite picture, content providers won’t be aloof. In fact, it seems pretty apparent that content shouldn’t be a problem for Google just as it’s not a problem for satellite and telco providers. Cable channels may come from and go to cable, but their main allegiance is to the almighty dollar and if Google can find a way to monetize its service, there will be multiple dollars to salute.

The likelihood is that Google, with an open platform and an army of eager apps developers will be able to come up with some sort of monetization formula that will draw the likes of broadcasters, cable channels and even existing online content providers like Hulu into the Google TV fold. So figure content is not a problem.

Distribution might be a bigger hurdle. Google has struck a deal with Best Buy so in the worst of circumstances it could have a Google-equipped set-top box or some other device for sale at your local big box store. It’s got a partnership with Sony so it could be included in a variety of Sony televisions. But to really get out there, Google needs to cut a deal with a cable or satellite box maker—Motorola, Cisco and quite possibly Pace—and they have to have the blessing of the service provider to incorporate Google. At that point, perhaps, it becomes Google TV channel, one multifaceted point where Google presents its apps and content and presence amid all the other cable selections. It’s not necessarily what the big boys in the Silicon Valley want, but it would be a workable idea in a cable/satellite dominated space.

Google TV surely looks like another ho-hum play in the video entertainment space until you take that second glance. At that point it looks like either a threat or a new avenue for cable. My guess is it will be a new avenue in an increasingly interactive cable space.


Dancing around IP video versus IPTV
Thursday, May 20th, 2010 by Edgar Villalpando – SVP Marketing

IP vs IPTV

There’s nothing like a good dance to get the ol’ juices stirred up. After watching the sidestepping and all-in-one line dancing that went on last week in Los Angeles at the Cable Show, I’d have to say the whole industry’s juices are flowing.

Cable engineers came out and said that they like the idea of IP transport. They’re in favor of IP video. But they stopped short of talking about IPTV. I’ve heard that part of this is just a stubborn refusal to give telcos like AT&T credit for anything. If they want to call their stuff IPTV then dammit we’ll just call ours IP video.

That required cable techs to do a boogaloo down Convention Way between IP video and IPTV while stepping lively between the two definitions. To my way of thinking, IP video is not quite up to snuff with IPTV which is professionally produced content delivered to the television set. IP video can be anything from your neighbor’s dog performing on YouTube to an oldies TV show on Hulu to last week’s episode of Justified. It’s all video; it’s all delivered over IP; but it’s not all TV.

I bring up the distinction because the folks at The Cable Show made it clear that they consider it important to differentiate between the two. Cable may or may not adopt IPTV—and it probably will, no matter what the industry says publicly—but last week’s show confirmed what I’ve known all along. IP video is an important element in the future of a cable MSO’s subscriber fare.

This is good news for ActiveVideo because it proves we’ve always been dancing to the right beat. You may have seen us at the show (this is my space so I’ll do commercials if I like); in fact, if you were there, you couldn’t have missed us. Our point was that IP is the transport media of record and that the cloud is the best place to store the interactive IP content that will rain down on subscribers.

The point that needs to be made—again and again and again—is that there’s too much content to store on site. The old model of the fat cable box is giving up to the thin client—or at least it is when it comes to interactivity. There might be benefits to keeping some TV shows—whether IPTV shows or not—on a DVR, but when it comes to the range of entertainment, knowledge and generally fun stuff associated with IPTV, there’s nothing like that big amorphous cloud in the sky to hold it until it’s needed.

So whether we’re looking at IP video, no matter how well or poorly produced; IPTV or any other definition of content, if it’s interactive, it’s IP and if it’s IP it should be stored in the cloud. Doesn’t matter what you call it.